top of page

Sustainable Supplier Selection and Evaluation: What Criteria Should You Use?

In an era where corporate responsibility takes centre stage, the criteria for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation have become integral components of strategic procurement. Organisations worldwide are recognising the imperative to align their supply chains with sustainable practices.

Beyond the traditional considerations of cost, quality, and reliability, the three pillars of sustainability—Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG)—are now paramount. Strategic integration aligns sustainability with overarching business goals.

However, not every tender may warrant an extensive sustainability criterion. Let's delve into practical considerations to enhance your supplier assessment process.


sustainable supplier evaluation and selection


Practical Considerations and Strategic Integration

In the realm of supplier selection, practicality often intertwines with strategy. A pivotal initial step is conducting a comprehensive risk and opportunity assessment. This evaluation empowers companies to make informed decisions about integrating sustainability criteria into their supplier selection process. It acts as a compass, guiding businesses to discern whether sustainability criteria are essential for a specific tender or transaction. Furthermore, it aids in determining the specific criteria that are most relevant, ensuring a tailored and effective integration of sustainability measures.

While the push for sustainability is undeniable, it's crucial to acknowledge that not every procurement scenario demands an exhaustive sustainability evaluation. For low-risk, one-off transactions or smaller-scale endeavours, practicality is key. In such cases, a commitment to sign and adhere to a Supplier Code of Conduct might suffice.

In more complex and strategic procurement endeavours, where long-term partnerships are forged, integrating sustainability criteria becomes a strategic imperative. Beyond mere compliance, seek suppliers who share your commitment to sustainability, creating a collaborative and ethical supply chain ecosystem.

This streamlined approach acknowledges that sustainability efforts should be commensurate with the scale and nature of the business relationship.



Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG): Examples of Criteria

Environmental Criteria: Assessing a supplier's environmental impact can involve evaluating their carbon footprint, waste management practices, and adherence to eco-friendly standards. Integration can include preferential treatment for suppliers with robust environmental policies or those actively working to reduce their carbon emissions.

Social Criteria: Social responsibility extends to aspects like labour practices, human rights, and community engagement. Supplier evaluation can encompass fair labour practices, living wage, diversity and inclusion initiatives, and contributions to local communities. Integrating these criteria ensures that your suppliers align with your commitment to social well-being.

Governance Criteria: Effective governance is the backbone of sustainable business practices. Supplier selection should consider factors such as transparency, anti-corruption measures, and adherence to ethical business standards. Integrating governance criteria fosters relationships with suppliers who share a commitment to ethical conduct.



Conclusion: Balancing Practicality and Progress

Sustainable supplier selection and evaluation are at the forefront of modern procurement strategies. Striking a balance between practicality and progress ensures that sustainability efforts align with the unique needs of each procurement scenario. As organisations navigate this dynamic landscape, BeeAware Consulting stands ready to guide and support your journey toward a more sustainable and responsible supply chain. For tailored assistance and expert insights on the criteria you can develop for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation, contact us at


bottom of page